Chemists and engineers have tinkered with natural oils for decades, finding new ways to transform them into useful molecules. Oleic acid presents a case in point. The fatty acid once got extracted mostly from olive oil and animal fats, used mainly for soap and simple surfactants. Curiosity about making surfactants for tough industrial environments led to new chemical families, including the imidazoline class. The amphoteric imidazolines, built from reacting oleic acid with polyamines, opened up fresh territory—resistance to hard water, tolerance of harsh acids and alkalis, and milder behavior around skin and fabric. Old patents from the 1940s and 1950s tell stories of trial and error on lab benches, hand-mixing fatty acids with diethylene triamine, tweaking temperatures and pressures, and keeping one eye on the emulsifying power of the new product. Today, digital labs and streamlined equipment speed up each step, but the basic reactions remain a nod to the chemists of that earlier era.
Oleic acid amphoteric imidazoline combines the backbone of a long-chain fatty acid with a nitrogen-rich imidazoline ring. The amphoteric label comes from its chemical personality—sometimes acting as an acid, sometimes a base, depending on the conditions. Folks use these compounds as corrosion inhibitors in oilfields, mild surfactants in household cleaners, foam boosters in shampoos, and wetting agents in textile mills. No single factory recipe covers all uses. Some companies tweak the fatty acid chain, some fiddle with the amine starting material, chasing the right mix of performance and cost for each client. All the same, the core remains an imidazoline headgroup—forged with care, attached to a greasy tail, able to play both sides in an acid-base fight.
Oleic acid amphoteric imidazoline comes off a reactor as a yellowish to amber liquid, smooth and slightly viscous at room temperature. The molecular weight sits in the 320-400 g/mol range, depending on the starting polyamine and whether the commercial product is cut with water or solvent. This surfactant mixes with both oils and water—hydrophobic at one end, hydrophilic at the other. Most variants dissolve in ethanol, isopropanol, and glycols, creating clear concentrates for easy handling. Odor can run faintly ammonia-like, a legacy of the amine component, but manufacturers often deodorize the finished product for sensitive uses. In terms of stability, amphoteric imidazolines tolerate high salt brines, acidic cleaning solutions, and shifts in water hardness better than most nonionic or anionic surfactants. Reports put the flash point above 180°C and the specific gravity near 0.9, meaning they ship as liquids under normal conditions.
Specifications vary across manufacturers, but most agree on a few key measures. These include an active content above 75% by weight, a pH in 1% solution hovering near neutral, and amine values (in mg KOH/g) that reveal the degree of alkali neutrality. Labels display ingredient lists per REACH, GHS, and local chemical inventories. For regulatory simplicity, the industry prefers INCI synonyms such as “Cocamidopropyl PG-Dimonium Chloride Phosphate” for cosmetic use, or “Amphoteric Imidazoline, derived from oleic acid,” in technical data sheets. Material safety data sheets break down hazards and recommend handling procedures in line with the Globally Harmonized System.
The preparation of this molecule reflects both chemistry tradition and modern process control. Industrial plants pump oleic acid into jacketed reactors, blending in diethylene triamine under nitrogen atmosphere to keep air and moisture out. The mixture gets heated to 160-200°C for two to eight hours, depending on the batch size and desired purity. Water distills out during the amidation and ring-closure steps. Operators monitor viscosity, acid number, color, and residual amine, then neutralize or dilute the intermediate with water or alcohol. Some plants adjust the pH with acetic acid or phosphoric acid, depending on the intended end use. Final product goes through filtration and quality checks, aiming for a uniform blend with minimal byproducts. This part of the business rewards patience—minor adjustments during heating can mean the difference between a clean, shelf-stable surfactant or one prone to viscosity swings and instability.
Oleic acid amphoteric imidazoline acts as a platform for further chemical modification. Alkylation, quaternization, or carboxymethylation each shift the target performance. For example, treating the imidazoline ring with monochloroacetic acid leads to carboxymethylated surfactants that boost solubility in cold water. Quaternization with methyl chloride yields cationic surfactants prized for hair conditioners or as fabric softeners. Hydrolysis—intentional or not—cracks open the imidazoline back to amidoamines and fatty acids, sometimes releasing small, odorous fragments. Control of these side reactions underpins most research aimed at making milder, less irritating consumer products.
Customs authorities, global buyers, and regulatory bodies each demand clear naming. Trade names like “Amphatronic OI,” “Imidazoline OA,” or “Oleamidopropyl Imidazoline” pop up in market listings. Industry catalogs sometimes list “fatty acid amido imidazoline amphoterics,” a mouthful that nods to the family’s roots. On cosmetics labels, the more consumer-friendly “Cocamidopropyl Imidazoline” or “Oleamidopropyl Betaine” makes an appearance, backed by registration with the Personal Care Products Council and review by international safety panels.
Shop floors and loading docks treat amphoteric imidazolines with the same care as other surfactants—eye protection, gloves, and controlled ventilation during bulk handling. Spills cause slipperiness but rarely carry acute toxicity or flammability dangers in normal settings. Workers monitor for skin or respiratory irritation, recognize that high concentrations or poorly ventilated areas bring risk of headaches or sensitization. Emergency plans focus on containment, neutralization with dilute acids, and non-combustible absorbents. International shipping follows IMDG and IATA guidelines, usually non-hazardous but flagged for aquatic toxicity in concentrated form. Plant teams rely on routine air monitoring for amines and amides, not just for legal compliance, but out of everyday care for the crew.
Few surfactants show more fingerprints across industry. Oil drillers run amphoteric imidazolines downhole to keep steel pipes from corroding in acid washes or salty water. Cleaners and detergents use the balancing act between acid and base to formulate products that remove soil without roughing up fabrics or skin. Textile dyers turn to these molecules for leveling dyes, boosting wet pick-up, and softening cloth. In cosmetics, gentle action lets shampoo and body wash lather well, rinse clean, and feel less harsh, especially in sulfate-free formats chasing growing markets in sensitive skin care. Water treatment plants find reliable help with demulsifiers and dispersants, controlling scale and foam in closed systems. My own experience with these materials caught the variety—one month seeing lab samples for baby shampoo panels, the next drawing up instructions for treating fouled steam boilers. Each job calls for a slightly different approach, sometimes switching out the acid or amine, but always looking for reliability under stress.
Lab notebooks filled with stability trials, irritation tests, and corrosion scoring sheets drive the evolution of these surfactants. Formulators chase lower toxicity, higher biodegradability, greater solubility in low-temperature water, and a softer after-feel in personal care products. Efforts focus on greener starting materials, recycling side streams, and eliminating hazardous byproducts. Wider adoption of plant-based oleic acid reduces dependence on petrochemical sources, closing loops in supply chains. Some labs focus on simplifying synthetic steps to lower both energy use and waste. Others wrestle with regulatory hurdles in emerging consumer markets, where demand for mild, “clean-label” surfactants grows annually. Decades ago, few outside the oil patch or dye house cared about amphoteric imidazolines; today, mainstream interest pushes constant improvement—and ratings from consumer watchdogs keep everyone honest.
All surfactants get scrutiny from both industry and academia, and amphoteric imidazolines run the gauntlet of skin patch tests, eye irritation screens, and aquatic toxicity panels. Current data show mild to moderate skin irritation risk at higher concentrations, on par with related fatty acid betaines. Oral and inhalation toxicity rates low, but eye contact calls for care. Breakdown in wastewater often yields biodegradable fragments, but regulators demand evidence for each new molecule. Chronic exposure studies run longer; efforts continue to nail down thresholds for workplace safety and to measure any persistent, bioaccumulative breakdown products. Companies stay alert to shifts in hazard rankings, both to protect workers and keep product lines compliant in global trade. In my time on formulation teams, every new surfactant blend raised the question: what happens downstream—does it build up, break down quickly, irritate sensitive skin, or get flagged in new environmental standards? That constant feedback loop keeps toxicologists tight with process engineers and marketing claims.
New applications and tougher sustainability standards put amphoteric imidazolines in a spotlight. Sectors like personal care, oil and gas, cleaning, and water treatment all push developers to trim out irritants, cut the energy and waste footprint, and meet world-class safety norms. Bio-based sources of oleic acid keep getting cheaper, and the global supply chain for nitrogen-based chemicals slowly widens after persistent bottlenecks. Next-generation plants eye continuous, closed processes, cutting CO₂ per ton of surfactant. Research into milder imidazoline blends aims to fulfill stricter cosmetic ingredient blacklists, sometimes fighting to prove historic safety to a skeptical public. Digital modeling and rapid lab trials speed up the race to find new modifications, so customers get more choices—lower irritation, higher cleaning power, stronger resistance to corrosion—in precise, tailored formulas. These shifts give the molecule a reputation not just as a legacy workhorse but as a platform for sensing what modern industry and consumers both expect.
Oleic acid amphoteric imidazoline may sound technical, but its story shapes up in places most folks never think about. I spent years working in a textile finishing plant, and my run-ins with this chemical happened on the floor—handling raw fabric, prepping it for dyeing, fighting stains, and dealing with plenty of greasy machines. Oleic acid, that same fatty acid found in olive oil, goes through a bit of chemistry magic to end up as this cleaner with a fancy name. At work, we’d pop open squat barrels labeled “corrosion inhibitor” or “textile softener,” and that’s where oleic acid amphoteric imidazoline made its mark.
Factories use this stuff mostly as a surfactant. Picture a surfactant as something that grabs hold of oil on one hand and water on the other, letting both mix together. This quality gives oleic acid amphoteric imidazoline its reputation in the oilfield world, helping strip oil off well equipment or clear up stubborn bits during drilling. The petroleum sector has relied on it to fight scale and corrosion for decades, with papers in journals like Corrosion Science pointing to its effectiveness at forming barrier layers against salty brines and acids.
I've seen it in metalworking too. We’d dump a batch in with the cooling fluids to keep steel clean and shiny as we cut it. Without additives like this, a workshop ends up rusted out and caked in black sludge. Its mild nature—thanks to the amphoteric part—means it doesn’t wreck metals or stain as much as more aggressive chemicals can.
The stuff isn’t just about oil rigs and gears. In the textile business, it softens fibers and finishes fabric with less irritation to hands. I remember workers preferring imidazoline-based products, because they rarely dried out skin, and no one walked around itchy or red. You’ll spot it in some laundry detergents and industrial hand soaps for the same reasons. Many formulations rely on this compound to cut through grease without burning skin or tearing up the fabric.
The amphoteric nature means it acts almost chameleon-like: adjusting based on the surrounding pH. In acidic or basic environments, it plays nice with other chemicals. This flexibility adds to its draw for product developers.
Safety matters. The Environmental Protection Agency and independent labs have weighed in, showing low acute toxicity at typical usage concentrations, though big spills shouldn’t drain into waterways. Oleic acid by itself breaks down in the environment, so it tends to have a lighter footprint than many petroleum-based surfactants. That doesn’t excuse sloppy handling, but in terms of worker safety and the land around plants, it stands up pretty well.
Industry still leans on petroleum-derived ingredients, but some newer versions of amphoteric imidazolines are sourced partly from renewables. If companies keep pushing for bio-based alternatives and tighter handling protocols, the overall impact on workers and nature improves.
Folks working with their hands know that cleaners and corrosion inhibitors aren’t glamorous, but the right formulation keeps factories humming and people safe. From the shop floor to the laundry room, oleic acid amphoteric imidazoline solves everyday problems in the background, one greasy rag or rusted bolt at a time.
Oleic acid amphoteric imidazoline pops up in plenty of industrial applications. It’s favored for its surfactant qualities, showing up in cleaning products, oilfield chemicals, metalworking fluids, and textile processing. Right now, the spotlight keeps swinging back to questions about environmental impact. Folks want assurances: is this ingredient breaking down in the environment, or is it hanging around causing harm?
Years spent around surfactants in industrial and laboratory settings left me knowing how easily these substances, in large volumes, slip into wastewater streams. The last thing anyone wants is another stubborn chemical sticking around in the soil and water. Watching how regulations kept evolving drives home the value of using biodegradable materials; regulations tighten and everyone scrambles if the science doesn’t support a product’s safety. Nobody forgets the scramble when an old standard gets banned for refusing to break down.
The word “imidazoline” sounds synthetic, but the backbone here comes from oleic acid, a fatty acid pulled from natural oils. There’s a big advantage to using ingredients rooted in nature. Study after study has shown that fatty-acid based surfactants break down more quickly than their petroleum-based cousins. Degradation rates depend on temperature, bacterial activity, and the presence of oxygen, but the trend is consistent: naturally sourced surfactants are less persistent.
Actual test results back this up. Research published in journals focused on environmental toxicology reports scores above 60% biodegradation (measured by DOC removal or CO2 evolution) in less than 28 days for imidazoline surfactants based on oleic acid. These results meet standards widely recognized for classifying a chemical as “readily biodegradable” such as the OECD 301 series of tests. Regulatory bodies in the EU and the US both reference these tests; the science lines up well with practical expectations.
Industries using surfactants have real pressure to limit persistent chemicals in water discharges. Municipal waste treatment plants run into trouble breaking down surfactants based on petroleum or those packed with halogenated chains. Sludge disposal and groundwater contamination aren’t just technical details—they shape the future health of local communities.
Switching to ingredients that break down faster lessens long-term exposure and ecosystem disruption. Growing up beside a local creek where fish sometimes vanished after big storms, I saw firsthand the damage surfactants and detergents can leave in their wake. My neighbors and I cleaned up foam-coated banks more than once—a clear signal of chemicals outpacing breakdown. Over the past decade, regulation forced many companies to adapt, and more readily degradable surfactants became the standard. Rivers and streams bounce back faster, and the worry about toxic legacy wanes.
Sourcing surfactants from oleic acid isn’t enough on its own. Formulators need to double-check that any modifications to boost amphoteric performance don’t block the chemical links bacteria rely on for biodegradation. If additives and stabilizers piggyback in, reviewing their safety becomes critical.
Communities and regulators keep looking for transparency. Third-party certifications, like those from the EU Ecolabel or U.S. EPA Safer Choice program, push manufacturers to open up their ingredient lists and share data on biodegradability. These labels don’t just signal safety—they rebuild trust after years of chemical secrecy. Keeping science open and accessible helps everyone involved, from factory workers to families enjoying cleaner rivers.
Working around specialty chemicals like Oleic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline keeps people on their toes. A friend of mine once told me how a simple splash in a lab left a mild chemical burn on his forearm, teaching him that modest carelessness can have quick consequences. Chemical burns, respiratory issues, and skin irritation pose real risks, particularly with surfactants and amphoteric substances. Oleic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline falls into this category, which urges everyone handling it to up their game, not just rely on usual habits.
Any reliable operation starts with reading and understanding the safety data sheet on a chemical. Oleic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline can irritate eyes, skin, and the respiratory system—even brief contact leads to redness or soreness. Wearing protective equipment isn’t about ticking off safety protocols on a list; it’s an act that saves skin and vision. Polycarbonate goggles, chemical-resistant gloves, and long-sleeved lab coats keep splashes and fumes where they belong—away from your body. I won’t forget the day I wiped chemical residue off a counter barehanded in a hurry—my palm reacted badly, and that minor slip cost a trip to health services. Lesson: don’t skip the gloves, even just for a minute.
Ventilation matters every bit as much as attire. Pouring or mixing the chemical where there’s no airflow increases the chance of inhaling fumes. Modern labs might feature fume hoods, but some older workspaces still rely on open windows or small extractor fans. If you’ve ever caught a lungful of solvent vapors, you won’t want that again. Breathing masks rated for organic vapors step in when the room can't do enough by itself.
Tidiness looks boring, but it’s one of the best acts of self-preservation. Leaving open bottles or chemical-streaked containers on benches invites accidents. Labeling becomes crucial—complacency with containers marked "soap base" led a co-worker of mine to pour amphoteric imidazoline down the wrong disposal drain, where it reacted badly with other substances. That incident taught the value of clear labeling and keeping incompatible chemicals apart.
Readiness for accidents also changes outcomes. Eyewash stations and safety showers, easily reachable and regularly checked, replace panic with quick, effective action. I’ve seen confusion and wasted seconds during spills before—having clear, practiced routines offers peace of mind. Absorbent pads, neutralizing agents, and spill kits sit in easy reach. Facility managers often drill teams in emergency cleanup—not out of paranoia, but out of hard-earned wisdom.
Rinsing amphoteric imidazoline down the drain may solve a short-term cleanup problem, but it stirs up bigger environmental issues. Many surfactants put pressure on wastewater treatment systems, and some break down slowly or pose risks to aquatic life. Professional facilities use closed systems or pre-treatment before disposal, and the local environmental rules guide every move. At a small operation I helped audit, collecting chemical liquids in drums for pickup wasn’t glamorous, but it kept both staff and the local river out of trouble.
People often see safety rules as a burden until something goes wrong. Experienced staff know how quickly normal routines break down after a spill or exposure. Training isn't a one-time chore—new chemicals, recipe tweaks, and fresh faces call for regular reviews. Leading by example—watching supervisors and senior staff buckle up goggles or double-check the gloves—spreads good habits through a team. Real safety grows out of consistent habits, quick cleanup routines, and respect for what chemicals can do, not out of posters or warnings alone.
Oleic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline plays a strong role in many formulations, from cleaning liquids to corrosion inhibitors. In my early work on industrial cleaning lines, no one handed out a one-size-fits-all chart. Instead, I learned fast that proper dosing starts with the intended job. At a surface level, you might see numbers like 0.5% to 3% recommended for cleaning formulas, but that’s only half the picture. Talking with plant chemists, real-world numbers often start low—around 0.5%—to keep foam in check and cut costs. For tougher jobs, like metal degreasing, concentrations can climb to 2–3% or a bit higher, depending on what kinds of soils and oils need removal.
Using too much Imidazoline wastes money, roughens up surfaces, and may leave residue. Too little means oil stays put and the job isn’t done, especially in hard water or oil-heavy settings. Back in my days troubleshooting bottling lines, running the right dose cut breakdowns and softened impact on pipes. In practical applications, the sweet spot rests in matching concentration to water hardness, level of contamination, and how much foam is acceptable. This holds true whether treating metal, making an all-purpose household detergent, or blending an agricultural adjuvant.
In oil field water injection, teams usually shoot for 1-5 ppm for corrosion control, though heavy oil environments have called for as much as 25 ppm. If you’re in textiles, the math changes—1–2% often works during scouring, since fabric and fiber conditions limit maximum dose. More isn’t always better; efficiency drops quickly once all binding sites fill up and soils lift off.
Trusted formulation isn’t guesswork. I once watched an operator double the dose for faster results; the machinery turned slick in a way that doubled cleanup time and nearly caused a shutdown. Product safety sheets for Oleic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline outline recommended levels, but actual numbers get dialed in through batch testing. Stability in solution, pH drift, water hardness, and residue potential all affect final concentration. It’s common sense, reinforced by trial runs, constant monitoring, and periodic review of wastewater—nobody enjoys fines or environmental headaches.
On every major production floor I’ve visited, the standard approach starts with pilot batches and scaling up. Measure performance in stages. Don’t leap to maximum level until lower limits fail. Keep in touch with raw material suppliers—many offer technical support and lab data showing how their version performs across applications. Tools like surface tension meters and residue tests give real figures to work with, not assorted guesses.
Today, sustainability matters as much as cleaning power. Paying attention to dosing means fewer chemicals wasted, less risk of hazardous runoff, and fewer headaches at wastewater treatment. Sticking to tested guidelines and watching process controls lets teams keep everyone safer, save money, and stay compliant. In my own experience, making time for dosage audits pays back triple in savings and peace of mind.
Oleic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline isn’t just another industrial chemical. It plays a big role in many industries, from cleaning to oilfield applications. Like many other surfactants, oleic acid derivatives can change character if left out in the wrong conditions. Humidity, temperature swings, or exposure to the wrong materials can take a quality product and turn it into a problem.
Years back, I worked at a plant where we stored similar surfactants in a section with poor ventilation. Over the summer, the product started clumping, and batches failed testing. Turns out, high heat and a slow leak from a nearby fitting turned the warehouse into a hostile environment. The lesson stuck with me: temperature and sealing matter for more reasons than production efficiency—they’re about product integrity and safety.
Keep this chemical in tightly sealed containers, preferably non-reactive drums or tanks. Avoid metal containers that rust easily, as they risk contaminating the product. Stainless steel offers more reliability for corrosion resistance. Polyethylene drums also work, provided they’re kept away from direct sunlight.
Temperature control matters a lot. Oleic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline stays stable at room temperature—roughly 15°C to 25°C in most regions. Heat causes yellowing or thickening. Cold brings precipitation of some components, which creates dosing headaches later on. Uninsulated warehouses can hit temperature extremes both ways, especially in winter and summer, so basic insulation and regular monitoring can save both product and money.
Moisture also creates trouble, as the material draws in water vapor. Keep storage areas low in relative humidity. A controlled warehouse isn’t luxurious—many plants already use desiccants or dehumidifiers to keep raw materials in spec, so applying those same tools here makes sense.
Shipping doesn’t run without risk. I’ve seen more than a few drums dented by forklifts or truck straps. Each dent becomes a failure point for leaks, leading to product losses or, in some cases, a hazardous cleanup. Loading liquid products on pallets and strapping them down well makes a difference. Those extra five minutes strapping things right in the shipping bay come back as zero headaches on arrival.
Check transport regulations for your region and intended destination. Chambers where temperature control fails can ruin sensitive products. When a client in Singapore once received a shipment that had sat in a hot container yard, they opened drums that looked more gelatinous than liquid. We sent replacements, but those costs add up quickly. Temperature indicators or simple data loggers give useful proof that shipments stayed in good shape.
Transport using certified hauliers and carriers who understand chemical cargo. Regular drivers might treat these containers like foodstuffs—missing the environmental risks. Training for those handlers goes beyond safety—if they know what to expect, mishaps become far less likely.
Everyone in the supply chain shares responsibility for chemical safety. If a drum leaks or sweats in a warehouse, contamination doesn’t just harm product quality—it can threaten employee health, corrode equipment, or even trigger regulatory trouble. Good labeling, tracking, and routine checks prevent those domino effects.
Materials like Oleic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline show their quirks over time, not just at delivery. Firms investing in solid storage infrastructure, temperature and humidity monitoring, and practical training for both warehouse and transport staff see fewer surprises. Over time, those investments save real money—and more importantly, they keep people safer and keep businesses running smoothly.
| Names | |
| Preferred IUPAC name | 4-[2-[(9Z)-Octadec-9-enoylamino]ethyl]-1,3-diazolidin-2-one |
| Other names |
Amphoteric Imidazoline Oleic Acid Imidazoline Oleyl Imidazoline Amphoteric Imidazoline amphoteric surfactant 1-Oleylaminoethyl-2-imidazoline amphoteric |
| Pronunciation | /ˈoʊliːɪk ˈæsɪd æmˈfɪtərɪk ɪˌmɪdəˈzoʊliːn/ |
| Identifiers | |
| CAS Number | 68650-55-5 |
| Beilstein Reference | 3522655 |
| ChEBI | CHEBI:140773 |
| ChEMBL | CHEMBL1374 |
| ChemSpider | 26387656 |
| DrugBank | DB11297 |
| ECHA InfoCard | 30dfb2c9-6e51-45d6-8ce1-6f0aae11baa9 |
| EC Number | 263-193-4 |
| Gmelin Reference | Gmelin Reference: 104923 |
| KEGG | C08361 |
| MeSH | D017879 |
| PubChem CID | 104847 |
| RTECS number | RN87563M7T |
| UNII | 0A666BME98 |
| UN number | UN3082 |
| CompTox Dashboard (EPA) | DTXSID6027808 |
| Properties | |
| Chemical formula | C21H41N3O2 |
| Molar mass | 327.54 g/mol |
| Appearance | Yellow to brownish yellow liquid |
| Odor | Characteristic |
| Density | 0.92 g/cm³ |
| Solubility in water | insoluble |
| log P | 4.6 |
| Vapor pressure | Negligible |
| Acidity (pKa) | ~4.75 |
| Basicity (pKb) | 9.5 (1% solution) |
| Magnetic susceptibility (χ) | −7.36×10⁻⁶ cm³/mol |
| Refractive index (nD) | 1.4300 - 1.4500 |
| Viscosity | 100~400 cps |
| Dipole moment | 5.72 D |
| Hazards | |
| Main hazards | Causes serious eye damage. Causes skin irritation. Harmful to aquatic life with long lasting effects. |
| GHS labelling | GHS07, GHS05 |
| Pictograms | GHS05,GHS07 |
| Signal word | Warning |
| Hazard statements | H315: Causes skin irritation. H319: Causes serious eye irritation. |
| Precautionary statements | P264, P280, P302+P352, P305+P351+P338, P321, P332+P313, P337+P313, P362+P364 |
| Flash point | > 185°C |
| Lethal dose or concentration | LD50 (oral, rat) > 5,000 mg/kg |
| LD50 (median dose) | LD50 (median dose): > 5,000 mg/kg (oral, rat) |
| NIOSH | no data |
| PEL (Permissible) | Not established |
| REL (Recommended) | 650 mg/m3 |
| Related compounds | |
| Related compounds |
Lauric Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline Stearic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline Cocoyl Amphoteric Imidazoline Myristic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline Palmitic Acid Amphoteric Imidazoline |
